Practical ISO/IEC 17020 Support for Accreditation-Ready Inspection

Fixed-fee support for inspection bodies that need stronger impartiality controls, consistent methods, reliable records, and accreditation-ready evidence.

Request an ISO/IEC 17020 Quote
ANSI-National-Accreditation-Board-200x80
American-National-Standards-Institute-200x80
CDC-Logo-1-200x80
KOMATSU-Logo
PACCAR-Logo
Volkswagen-Logo-200x80
Department-of-Defense
DHA-Logo-1-200x80


Understanding ISO/IEC 17020

How ISO/IEC 17020 Becomes Relevant in Practice

ISO/IEC 17020 is the competence and impartiality standard for inspection bodies, but in practice it becomes relevant when organizations need consistent inspection methods, clearer technical control, and accreditation-ready evidence.

What ISO/IEC 17020
Establishes

ISO/IEC 17020 establishes requirements for inspection-body competence, impartiality, consistent methods, personnel, records, reporting, and quality control.

When Inspection Bodies Usually Need It

Inspection bodies usually pursue ISO/IEC 17020 when regulators, customers, or markets require accredited results and stronger technical credibility.

Why It Starts to
Matter

ISO/IEC 17020 starts to matter when inspection decisions rely on individual judgment, inconsistent methods, weak records, or unclear impartiality controls.



WHERE YOU ARE IN THE PROCESS

Inspection Bodies Pursuing ISO/IEC 17020 Usually Start From One of Three Realities

Inspection bodies do not all arrive at ISO/IEC 17020 from the same place. In most cases, the project begins because customer expectations, regulatory requirements, impartiality scrutiny, or accreditation pressure is exposing gaps in inspection control.

Understanding your starting point helps shape an ISO/IEC 17020 path that fits your inspection scope, technical maturity, ownership, and accreditation timeline.

Accreditation Is Coming, but the Project Is Still Unclear

You know ISO/IEC 17020 is becoming necessary, but scope, inspection type, effort, timing, and the right level of support still need to be defined.

Your Inspection System Needs Structure Without Slowing Delivery

Customer pressure, regulatory requirements, or growth may be pushing accreditation forward, but controls must remain practical across inspection activities.

You Are Still Working Out What ISO/IEC 17020 Will Involve

You may still be clarifying what ISO/IEC 17020 requires, how it applies to your inspection body, and what accreditation will mean in practice.



For Internal Champions

If You Are Driving ISO/IEC 17020 Internally, You Are Probably Being Asked to Clarify More Than the Assessment

Before ISO/IEC 17020 implementation begins, someone inside the inspection body usually needs to define scope, estimate effort, shape a realistic timeline, and explain what support is needed. That is often where projects slow down before they properly begin.

“These are usually the questions that need answers before the project can move.”

Clear Scope

Define which inspection activities, locations, methods, personnel, equipment, decision criteria, and inspection types belong inside the accreditation scope.

Internal Effort

Understand what leadership, technical managers, inspectors, quality personnel, method owners, and impartiality roles must contribute before implementation begins.

Realistic Timeline

Build a practical plan based on current technical maturity, method consistency, record readiness, and the work required before accreditation.

Practical Support

Set clear expectations around milestones, deliverables, support level, and project cost so the path to ISO/IEC 17020 accreditation is easier to approve.

Implementation support should strengthen inspection competence before it satisfies the assessment, giving teams clearer technical ownership, better method consistency, and stronger accreditation readiness without turning ISO/IEC 17020 into a paperwork exercise.



What ISO/IEC 17020 Solves

The Standard Becomes Relevant When Informal Inspection Control Starts Creating Risk

ISO/IEC 17020 usually becomes necessary when inspection methods, impartiality risks, technical decisions, and reporting expectations start exposing the limits of informal control. This is where a structured inspection management system begins to add real value.

Inconsistent Inspection Methods

Inspection activities are performed differently across inspectors, locations, or assignments, making decisions harder to reproduce consistently.

Weak Technical Ownership

Responsibilities for methods, competence, equipment, review, reporting, and technical decisions are unclear across the inspection body.

Impartiality
Risks

Commercial, operational, or relationship pressures may influence inspection activities without clear identification, review, or mitigation.

Incomplete Inspection Records

Method, competency, equipment, decision, and reporting records may not clearly demonstrate consistent inspection control.

Limited Technical Visibility

Leadership lacks a clear view of inspection performance, impartiality risks, competency gaps, findings, and accreditation readiness.



WHY A TO Z Management Consulting

Why Inspection Teams Trust A to Z With ISO/IEC 17020

We do not force your inspection body into a generic quality model. We adapt ISO/IEC 17020 to your methods, personnel, equipment, technical decisions, and impartiality responsibilities, so the system is easier to operate and defend during assessment.

100%

Success Rate

“We bring a strong track record across ISO/IEC 17020 and technical management systems, helping inspection bodies move toward accreditation readiness with an approach that holds up in practice.”

Fixed-Fee Support

Defined deliverables, clear project phases, and straightforward pricing make the engagement easier to evaluate internally and manage without hidden surprises.

Milestone Delivery

The work is structured around clear stages, so progress is visible, responsibilities are clearer, and the path to accreditation is easier to plan.

Aligned to Inspection Operations

ISO/IEC 17020 is aligned to your actual inspection methods, personnel, equipment, reporting, decision criteria, and impartiality responsibilities.

Less Paperwork

We focus on essential technical documentation, consistent methods, and usable evidence so teams can sustain accreditation without unnecessary burden.

Proprietary compliance software (optional add-on)

Compliance Command™ is our proprietary compliance management platform designed to help organizations implement, manage, and continually improve compliance and management systems through a single integrated solution.

Learn More


Our ISO/IEC 17020 Services

Expert Support Across Every Stage of ISO/IEC 17020

Whether you are defining accreditation scope, strengthening inspection control, preparing for assessment, or improving technical visibility, we provide practical support across the full ISO/IEC 17020 journey.

Consulting

Practical Guidance for Accreditation
• Accreditation scoping and planning
• Gap review and roadmap
• Inspection system design
• Documentation development

Auditing

Clear Visibility into Gaps and Readiness
• Internal audit planning and execution
• Audit findings and corrective action
• Method and record reviews
• Impartiality and compliance evaluation

Training

Practical Learning for Stronger Ownership
• ISO/IEC 17020 awareness sessions
• Inspector and leadership training
• Internal audit training 
• Method and impartiality training

Software

Structured Visibility for System Management
• Integrated compliance platform
• Automated workflows and approvals
• Multi-standard compliance support
• Real-time readiness visibility



WHAT GOOD LOOKS LIKE

An Inspection Management System That Works in Practice

ISO/IEC 17020 readiness is visible in competent inspectors, consistent methods, impartial decisions, usable records, and controlled reporting.

Consistent Inspection Methods

Inspection methods are current, understood, controlled, and applied consistently across inspectors, locations, and assignments.

Demonstrated Inspector Competence

Competence requirements are defined, assessed, authorized, maintained, and supported by evidence tied to inspection responsibilities.

Protected Impartiality

Impartiality risks are identified, reviewed, controlled, and monitored so inspection decisions remain objective and defensible.

Usable Inspection Records

Method, equipment, competency, decision, reporting, and review records clearly demonstrate consistent inspection control.



HOW IT WORKS

A Structured ISO/IEC 17020 Accreditation Approach

1

Gap Assessment

Review current inspection practices against ISO/IEC 17020 and identify gaps affecting competence, impartiality, methods, records, and accreditation.

2

Documentation Development

Develop inspection procedures, records, forms, and controls aligned to methods, equipment, personnel, reporting, and accreditation scope.

3

Implementation

Embed method control, inspector competence, equipment management, impartiality safeguards, decision review, and reporting into operations.

4

Internal Audit

Test inspection consistency, record quality, competence evidence, impartiality controls, and accreditation readiness through internal review.

5

Readiness Review

Close remaining gaps, validate technical evidence, strengthen management review, and confirm readiness before accreditation assessment.

6

Assessment Support

Support accreditation assessments by presenting inspection records, competency files, methods, impartiality evidence, and controls clearly.
Get Practical ISO/IEC 17020 Guidance


Implementation Deliverables

What You’ll Have At The End Of The Project

By the time your inspection body is ready for accreditation, you will have an implemented ISO/IEC 17020 system that strengthens competence, impartiality, and assessment readiness.

Core System Deliverables

Technical Foundation

  • Methods Defined and Controlled
  • Roles and responsibilities established
  • Competence and Impartiality Controls in Place
  • Controlled Inspection Records Available
  • Inspector Training and Authorization Completed
Audit Readiness Deliverables

Accreditation Readiness

  • Internal audits completed
  • Management review conducted
  • Corrective actions implemented
  • Technical Evidence Available
  • Accreditation Readiness Demonstrated


Outcomes Beyond Accreditation

What a Well-Implemented ISO/IEC 17020 System Should Improve

The value of ISO/IEC 17020 should extend beyond accreditation. A well-implemented system improves inspection consistency, technical credibility, review discipline, and customer confidence.

gears

Reliable Inspection Operations

  • More consistent inspection methods
  • Clearer technical ownership
  • Fewer decision-quality gaps
Data-Driven Decisions

Data-Driven
Decisions

  • More usable inspection data
  • Stronger competency visibility
  • Clearer improvement priorities
Audit Readiness

Readiness & Review Discipline

  • Clearer technical evidence
  • Better internal audit discipline
  • Reliable management review
Commercial Confidence

Customer & Regulatory Confidence

  • Stronger inspection credibility
  • More customer trust
  • Better market acceptance


Who We Support

Supporting Inspection Bodies Where Technical Credibility Affects Market Acceptance

We support inspection bodies where competence, impartiality, consistent methods, and defensible reporting directly affect accreditation and customer confidence.

Industrial Inspection Bodies

Consistent methods and technical decisions matter.

Construction Inspection Providers

Competence and reporting need clear control.

Product Inspection Organizations

Conformity decisions must remain defensible.

Vehicle And Equipment Inspectors

Technical consistency supports public confidence.

Government Inspection Programs

Impartiality and records must withstand scrutiny.

Multi-Site Inspection Companies

Consistent methods matter across every location.

Explore Your ISO/IEC 17020 Readiness


Company Stats

A track record built across high-
accountability standards

A to Z Management Consulting supports organizations operating in environments where quality, consistency, and accountability directly affect performance and customer confidence. We turn certification requirements into practical implementation aligned with real operations, helping organizations achieve certification readiness without overengineering the system. Our long-term client relationships and 100% certification success rate reflect that trust.

100%

Successful Readiness Outcomes

1000+

Organizations Supported
Globally

30+

Regulated Standards Covered

20+

Years of Consulting Experience

“ I was hired to develop the ISO system to get this facility certified in ISO 9001 and 45001. I needed a system that could store our quality documents, track audits, and track corrective actions. The A to Z staff has been wonderful. They have provided support and upgrades that made the system more user friendly. They also helped with the initial gap analysis and internal audit to ensure we were on the right track in our certification journey. The outcome was fantastic, including getting certified on our first attempt. Michael L. Wherry ISO Coordinator, Komatsu
“ Our OEMs demanded that we get the TISAX Label within a certain timeframe if we wished to get continued contracts awarded. We had no TISAX expertise internally and needed external consulting. We came across the A to Z Management Consulting team, who had deep and superior experience. With A to Z’s team-based approach, deep experience, and superb management, we were able to attain our Information Security High Availability Label for two sites within six months. The return on our investment with A to Z has been immeasurable. We would definitely select them in the future when the need arises again. Karim Virjee Cybersecurity Program Manager, Woodbridge Foam Corporation
“ Managing multiple standards at the same time can quickly become complicated, but the commitment felt organized from the start. The A to Z Team was able to clearly break down the requirements, keep priorities aligned, and help us make significant progress without creating unnecessary bureaucracy. Their breadth of experience across different frameworks was evident throughout the process. Additionally, their practical and collaborative approach managed to involve process owners, ensuring that activities were not only carried out effectively but also reviewed and validated by their expert team in standards such as ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 45001. Their specialized advice allowed us to optimize our management systems and achieve our quality, environmental and safety objectives efficiently and sustainably. Vanessa Aguilar Quality Engineer, ChargePoint
“ We needed a partner who understood that certification work still has to fit around the realities of running the business day to day. A to Z did a great job of balancing structure with flexibility. Their guidance was thorough, easy to follow, and never felt heavier than it needed to be. That made a real difference for our team. Trent Tucker General Manager, American Carton Company
“ We began working with A to Z Management Consulting during our initial ISO 9001 implementation and have continued the relationship with their team ever since. Their ability to clearly explain the standard, and pending standard updates, has made it easier for our team to stay aligned and informed. The A to Z team approaches audits with a level of detail and organization that helps us prepare effectively and move into accreditation audits with confidence. Since our accreditation, we have successfully completed every external audit without a non-conformity, something we attribute to a strong internal system, supported by the guidance and structure A to Z provides. A to Z has been a valuable partner in strengthening our quality management efforts. Megan Pogwist General Manager, Packaging HERO
“ A to Z Management Consulting delivered highly effective ISO 14001 training with a strong focus on operational execution and audit readiness. The program translated requirements into clear, actionable practices, enabling our teams to quickly align processes, close gaps, and improve consistency across the organization. As a result, we saw accelerated readiness for certification activities and greater confidence at both the leadership and operational levels. The engagement was professional, results-driven, and directly supported our environmental management objectives. Kaveh Moraghebi Vice President, Quality, Regulatory & Sustainability, ALOM
“ We were not familiar with ISO, and A to Z was able to provide assistance from the ground up. Our experience has been great. A to Z has a knowledgeable team with clear and responsive communication. Strong knowledge and experience stood out throughout the engagement, and we have successfully passed ISO audits, which is a strong result. Isabelle Jung P.Q.D. International Inc.
“ After losing our Quality Supervisor, we needed immediate support to achieve ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certification. A to Z quickly understood our situation and the limitations of our internal resources. From the start, they took the lead, provided a clear path forward, and guided us through building the required documentation and processes without overwhelming our team. What stood out most was A to Z’s ability to translate ISO requirements into clear, practical terms. As a result, we successfully achieved both ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certification, and we gained a solid understanding of how to maintain and continually improve our system going forward. Carol Smith EHS Manager, Westwater Resources
“ Before working with A to Z, we did not fully understand what it takes to develop an Information Security Management System that meets ISO 27001 standard applicable to our business. The team was patient, knowledgeable, and able to explain difficult terminology and system requirements in simple terms. Their support gave us the clarity we needed to successfully pass the audit and get certified. Chrissy Ervin JDM List Services
“ I was compelled to work with A to Z Management Consulting for our ISO 13485 after learning that the team’s approach was not only to deliver an ISO-certified quality system, but to help optimize the business system altogether. We were assigned a masterclass consultant who had a deep understanding of the ISO standards. Our consultant took apart our existing ISO 9001 system and rebuilt it piece by piece on a foundation of basic quality fundamentals. Having worked with other quality consulting firms, I can comfortably rate the quality system we developed with A to Z as being of the highest caliber. Marios D. Demetriou, PhD Co-Founder and CEO, Glassimetal Technology
“ We engaged A to Z Management Consulting to pursue our first ISO certification under a very aggressive timeline. The experience was smooth and efficient, with their auditor committed to supporting us from start to finish. We appreciated their project management software and schedule. The FFP (outcome-based) arrangement helped us control costs as a small business. As a result, we were recommended for accreditation by our external auditor. We look forward to working with A to Z Management Consulting for future certifications. Sonia Mundra COO, EnProVera Corporation
“ I worked with Simon and his team when we were working towards our ISO9001 certification. We had policies in place but not in an organized fashion. A to Z management consulting came in and took care of the administrative tasks, organizing our team, holding meetings and holding people accountable so we could get our certification completed in record time. We kept working with A to Z Management after we successfully passed our first audit to ensure we stayed on track and they helped us train our quality lead so we could be self-sufficient. I highly recommend Simon and A to Z Management. They made a complex application process and system simple and straight forward. They are extremely knowledgeable. Larry Glick Marketing Manager, Asahi Refining USA, Inc.
“ We have been working with A to Z Management Consulting since 2020, when they initially helped us develop and implement our Quality Management System and successfully prepare for ISO 9001 certification. Since then, they have continued to support us with our annual internal audits and certification readiness. Their team has been knowledgeable, responsive, and easy to work with, and their practical approach has helped us maintain our QMS and stay prepared for our certification audits year after year. We value the ongoing relationship and appreciate the consistent support A to Z Management Consulting has provided to our team. Jay Patel President, Accurate Rubber Corporation
“ Toluca Foods initially engaged A to Z Management Consulting after receiving a strong recommendation from another customer and recognizing the need to obtain SQF certification for our facility. From the beginning, the experience was excellent. A to Z provided clear guidance, structure, and support throughout the entire process. What stood out most was the professionalism and personalized approach, ensuring that our specific operational needs were fully understood and addressed. Thanks to this partnership, we achieved SQF certification and earned an Excellent rating on our first audit, a milestone that added significant value and credibility to our organization. Mauricio Hidalgo Head of Operations, Toluca Foods

ISO/IEC 17020 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is ISO/IEC 17020 in simple terms?

ISO/IEC 17020 is the international standard used to assess the competence, impartiality, and consistent operation of organizations that perform inspections. 

In simple terms, it helps an inspection body define who is qualified to conduct inspections, how inspection methods are controlled, how impartiality is protected, how equipment and records are managed, and how inspection results are reviewed and reported. 

The objective is to give customers, regulators, and other interested parties confidence that inspection decisions are technically sound, consistent, and supported by reliable evidence. 

The current title is ISO/IEC 17020:2026, Conformity Assessment — Requirements for Bodies Performing Inspection. 

The standard establishes requirements for the competence, impartiality, and consistent operation of inspection bodies. 

People often shorten the name to ISO 17020, but the correct designation is ISO/IEC 17020 because the standard was developed jointly by the International Organization for Standardization and the International Electrotechnical Commission. 

Using the full designation is preferable in formal documents, accreditation scopes, proposals, policies, and website content.

No. 

Inspection bodies are normally accredited against ISO/IEC 17020 by a recognized accreditation body. They are not conventionally certified in the same way an organization may be certified against ISO 9001 or ISO 14001. 

Accreditation evaluates both the inspection body’s management arrangements and its technical competence to perform specific inspection activities.

Certification confirms that an organization, product, process, service, or person meets defined requirements. 

Accreditation confirms that a conformity assessment body is competent to perform particular conformity assessment activities. 

For an ISO/IEC 17020 inspection body, accreditation examines matters such as: 

  • Inspector competence 
  • Inspection methods 
  • Impartiality 
  • Equipment 
  • Technical oversight 
  • Inspection records 
  • Reporting 
  • Decision consistency 
  • Defined accreditation scope 

Accreditation therefore provides a deeper assessment of technical capability within the approved scope.

ISO/IEC 17020 is relevant to organizations that perform inspections and issue findings, determinations, or conformity decisions based on examination, professional judgment, measurement, observation, testing, or document review. 

That can include: 

  • Government inspection agencies 
  • Regulatory inspection bodies 
  • Engineering inspection companies 
  • Construction inspection bodies 
  • Building inspection organizations 
  • Fire-safety inspection bodies 
  • Pressure-equipment inspectors 
  • Electrical inspection bodies 
  • Lifting-equipment inspectors 
  • Vehicle inspection organizations 
  • Product inspection bodies 
  • Commodity inspection companies 
  • Manufacturing inspection teams 
  • Food and agricultural inspection bodies 
  • Environmental inspection organizations 
  • Infrastructure inspection providers 
  • Marine and cargo inspection companies 

The relevant accreditation scope depends on the inspection activities, sectors, methods, products, installations, and regulatory requirements involved.

ISO/IEC 17020 usually becomes relevant when customers, regulators, government agencies, courts, procurement teams, or other parties need stronger assurance that inspection results are independent, technically competent, and consistently produced. 

It often becomes necessary when: 

  • Accreditation is required by regulation 
  • A government contract specifies it 
  • Customers require accredited reports 
  • Inspection decisions affect safety or market access 
  • Multiple inspectors need consistent methods 
  • Technical competence must be independently demonstrated 
  • Conflicts of interest need stronger control 
  • The inspection body wants wider recognition 
  • Existing quality procedures are no longer sufficient 
  • The organization is entering regulated inspection markets 

At that point, accreditation becomes both a technical-assurance requirement and a commercial qualification issue.

ISO/IEC 17020 matters because it creates stronger control around how inspection conclusions are reached. 

Accreditation may be the immediate objective, but a well-implemented system can also improve: 

  • Inspector competence 
  • Technical consistency 
  • Inspection planning 
  • Impartiality management 
  • Equipment control 
  • Record retrieval 
  • Report accuracy 
  • Complaint handling 
  • Leadership visibility 
  • Customer confidence 
  • Regulatory credibility 
  • Corrective action 

The strongest value comes when the system improves real inspection activity rather than existing only for an accreditation assessment.

Yes. 

Accreditation can give customers and procurement teams greater confidence that the inspection body has been independently evaluated for competence and impartiality within a defined scope. 

It may support: 

  • Government tenders 
  • Regulatory authorization 
  • Supplier qualification 
  • Customer onboarding 
  • Engineering contracts 
  • Construction projects 
  • International trade 
  • Product acceptance 
  • Safety programs 
  • Legal or insurance-related inspections 

Accreditation does not guarantee every commercial opportunity, but it may remove a significant qualification barrier.

In many cases, yes. 

Starting early gives the organization time to define its inspection scope, establish competency criteria, validate methods, control equipment, assess impartiality risks, generate inspection records, complete internal audits, and close technical gaps. 

Waiting until a contract explicitly requires accreditation can create a compressed timeline that is difficult to meet because accreditation bodies need evidence that the inspection system is already operating.

No. 

Independent third-party inspection bodies are a major part of the accreditation market, but organizations performing inspections within or for a related business may also be eligible. 

The current edition distinguishes between: 

  • Type A inspection bodies 
  • Type non-A inspection bodies 

The correct classification depends on the inspection body’s relationships, responsibilities, independence, and potential conflicts of interest. 

A Type A inspection body is independent from the parties involved in the items or activities it inspects. 

It is generally expected to operate as a third-party inspection body and avoid involvement in activities that could compromise its independence, such as designing, manufacturing, supplying, installing, purchasing, owning, using, or maintaining the items it inspects where those relationships would create unacceptable conflicts. 

Type A status must be supported by the organization’s structure, relationships, activities, ownership, and impartiality controls.

A Type non-A inspection body does not meet all the structural independence conditions required for Type A. 

It may perform inspections for its parent organization, related entities, internal operations, or external customers while controlling threats to impartiality through appropriate safeguards. 

Type non-A does not mean the inspection body is less technically competent. It means its independence relationships differ and must be identified, evaluated, controlled, and transparently addressed.

Under ISO/IEC 17020:2012, inspection bodies were classified as Type A, Type B, or Type C. 

ISO/IEC 17020:2026 simplifies these categories into: 

  • Type A 
  • Type non-A 

The revision was intended to reduce ambiguity and improve practical application of the independence requirements. 

The current edition is ISO/IEC 17020:2026. 

It is the third edition and replaces ISO/IEC 17020:2012, which has been technically revised. 

The principal changes include: 

  • Simplifying independence classifications to Type A and Type non-A 
  • Introducing stronger risk-based thinking 
  • Increasing flexibility in how some requirements are implemented 
  • Adding updated provisions for data and information control 
  • Modernizing terminology and structure 
  • Clarifying expectations around competence, impartiality, and consistent operation 

Organizations accredited to the 2012 edition should review formal transition requirements issued by their accreditation body. 

New implementation projects should now use ISO/IEC 17020:2026 as their primary requirements basis. 

Organizations already accredited against the 2012 edition should follow the transition instructions, timelines, and assessment arrangements communicated by their accreditation body. 

Existing documentation should not simply have its version number changed. The organization needs to evaluate the substantive changes, including independence classification, risk-based thinking, and information-control requirements.

ISO/IEC 17020 addresses the organizational, technical, and management controls required for reliable inspection activities. 

Key areas include: 

  • Impartiality 
  • Independence 
  • Confidentiality 
  • Legal and organizational structure 
  • Responsibilities 
  • Personnel competence 
  • Inspector authorization 
  • Facilities 
  • Equipment 
  • Inspection methods 
  • Inspection planning 
  • Sampling 
  • Handling inspection items 
  • Records 
  • Inspection reports and certificates 
  • Complaints 
  • Appeals 
  • Nonconforming work 
  • Corrective action 
  • Internal audits 
  • Management review 
  • Data and information control 

The system must support both technical validity and consistent operation.

An inspection body is an organization, or a defined part of an organization, that performs inspections. 

Inspection may involve examining: 

  • Products 
  • Processes 
  • Services 
  • Installations 
  • Facilities 
  • Designs 
  • Materials 
  • Workmanship 
  • Operational conditions 
  • Documents 
  • Equipment 
  • Assets 

The inspection body determines whether the inspected item or activity conforms to specified requirements or professional judgment criteria.